Skip to main content
report

A comparison of different particle size analysis techniques

Authors

Abstract

In this study, we compared different methods of testing particle size of ground corn. Forty-four corn samples were analyzed for particle size with a Ro-Tap tester equipped with a 13-sieve stack (53 to 3,350 :m tyler mesh screens). Mean particle size of the 44 samples ranged from 422 to 1,143 :m. These samples were then analyzed by placing 280 g on a #14 sieve (1,400 :m). The sieve was shaken by hand as the manufacturer recommended (one-sieve method). In a second procedure, samples were analyzed by placing 50 g of corn on a stack of three sieves: US #12 (1700 :m), #30 (600 :m), and #50 (300 :m: three-sieve method) with balls and carnucles. The three-sieve method was much more reliable in predicting average particle size of ground corn than the one-sieve method when compared to the 13- stack standard operating procedure. In summary, the three-sieve procedure may be a more accurate method to quickly determine particle size than the one-sieve method.; Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 15, 2001

Keywords: Swine day, 2001, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution, no. 02-132-S, Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service), 880, Swine, Ground corn, Particle size, Procedures

How to Cite:

Baldridge, A. L., Stainbrook, T. L., Woodworth, J. C., Tokach, M. D., Nelssen, J. L. & Goodband, R. D., (2001) “A comparison of different particle size analysis techniques”, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 1(10), 138-141. doi: https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.6683

Downloads:
Download PDF

0 Views

0 Downloads

Published on
2001-01-01