Skip to main content
report

Compudose® vs Ralgro®/Synovex-S® or Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® Reimplant programs for finishing yearling steers

Authors
  • Compudose® vs Ralgro®/Synovex-S® or Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® Reimplant  programs for finishing yearling steers

    report

    Compudose® vs Ralgro®/Synovex-S® or Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® Reimplant programs for finishing yearling steers

    Authors

Abstract

Three field trials were conducted with finishing yearling steers to compare the performance of cattle receiving Compudose® or Ralgro®/Synovex-S® and Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® reimplant combinations. No differences were found between Compudose and the reimplant programs in cattle daily gain, feed efficiency, or cost of gain. Compudose retention was 97.5% in the 1317 head implanted. Synovex-S implant site abscess rate ranged from 5.7 to 15.4%.

Keywords: Cattlemen's Day, 1987, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution, no. 87-309-S, Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service), 514, Beef, Compudose® vs Ralgro®, Reimplant, Steers

How to Cite:

Laudert, S. & Lee, R., (1987) “Compudose® vs Ralgro®/Synovex-S® or Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® Reimplant programs for finishing yearling steers”, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 1(1), 32-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.2358

Downloads:
Download PDF

0 Views

0 Downloads

Published on
1987-01-01