Abstract

This article examines the discourse on kitsch articulated by Austrian novelists Hermann Broch (1886-1951) and Robert Musil (1880-1942) between 1930 and 1950. In particular, I focus on the ways in which the two novelists draw the distinction of value between real and pseudo art (or kitsch). As I argue, their disagreement on this matter is emblematic of dilemmas that continue to confront aesthetic evaluation today. While Broch anchors value in a metaphysical realm on the outside of aesthetic discourse, assuming a late-idealistic notion of art, Musil frames the distinction between 'good' and 'bad' art within an empirical, relativistic, and immanent understanding of aesthetic experience. In the final section I draw on Hal Foster's notion of a "critical distance" (The Return of the Real, 1996) to discuss the advantages and limitations of the evaluative paradigms suggested by the two novelists.

Keywords: kitsch, Austria, Austrian literature, Hermann Broch, Robert Musil, real art, pseudo art, art, late-idealistic art, relativistic, aesthetic experience, Hal Foster, critical distance, The Return of the Real

How to Cite:

McBride, P. C., (2005) “The Value of Kitsch. Hermann Broch and Robert Musil on Art and Morality”, Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature 29(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.1604